Talk:Stealth game/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   All images are free, very good.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   The image you do have is good, although there are some areas in which an extra image might help the reader understand what you are talking about, the article still works well with only the one screenshot.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   A very nice article. At first I thought the article was very short, and they must be missing something, but after looking at other video game genre articles, and reading this one I found there wasn't much information that could be added. An article doesn't have to be long to be of good quality, and this article proves it. Epass (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)