Talk:Stefano Zacchiroli
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Unwarranted deletion
editThe article clearly said that its namesake was the leader of the Debian project. How is that not important? Steve McIntyre has a page, so why can't there be a Stefano Zacchiroli page?Attys (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- How does this meet the criteria in WP:BIO or WP:GNG? ttonyb (talk) 03:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
It just seems like if we have a page for some Debian Project Leaders, we should have one for all. Each one is equally important to the project. I agree that this article is currently just a stub, but it cannot grow if it is deleted immediately. Attys (talk) 07:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- That is not how Wikipedia works. You can't just create an article for a person because they are a Debian Project Leader, instead you have to justify each person being notable in their own right. WP:NOTABILITY:
| “ | if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article... If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.
"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail |
” |
- So where is the significant coverage of this man and his life? Where are the extensive third party sources on the topic of this man and his life? Having a particular job or role, or being mentioned in passing as the author of some particular software, is not enough, there should be extensive third-party sources that discuss this article topic (the man and his life) in detail. That's how notability works on Wikipedia. 90.193.161.42 (talk) 14:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Photos
editI have two fairly terrible photos of _zack, both taken at the OCaml users conference last April:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stefano_Zacchiroli_1.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stefano_Zacchiroli_2.jpg
Maybe the second one is reasonable for this article with a bit of cropping.
Grammar suggestion
edit"Succeeding Steve McIntyre, he was himself succeeded by Lucas Nussbaum in an election where he himself was no longer a candidate." to "Succeeding Steve McIntyre, Zacchiroli was succeeded by Lucas Nussbaum, after abstaining from the election." 68.201.64.136 (talk) 05:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)