Talk:Steinmetz's equation
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
About Steinmetz’s Equation I
editWhy did you delete my contribution about p(t)=v(t)*i(t) without any explanatios? --Saksoy14 (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for contacting me. The content that you added regarding Poynting vector to Steinmetz's equation was reverted because it was only vaguely related to Steinmetz's equation which is a non-linear, empirical equation for estimating power loss in certain magnetic materials. While, when a transformer is in use, there must be a PV, in practice it is intractable to compute. Similarly, V x I is not useful because V x I computes the total power whereas Steinmetz's equation tells you the portion of the power going into magnetic loss. Finally, the fact that Balci et al state that they precisely derive in 2021 a result well known for over a century isn’t interesting.
- A couple of points about Wikipedia etiquette:
- I did leave an explanation. It might have been terse. Saying that I left you no explanation is like saying that I am rude. Some editors will take offense at that. On the other hand, there is no harm in asking for further explanation.
- When you add a new section to a talk page, it should always go at the bottom. If you use the “new section” tab at the top of the page, it will automatically place the new section at the bottom.
Feel free to contact me if you have questions. Constant314 (talk) 22:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
About Steinmetz’s Equation II
editAs you said, Steinmetz’s Equation is an empirical one. In this sense, for the first time in literature, its well-known and widely-used version in time domain (instantaneous power equation p(t)=v(t).i(t) for harmonic or non-harmonic sources) is theoretically extracted by us (for the first time in literature). Therefore, it is directly related to Steinmetz’s Equation and power theory. In fact, our contribution makes a good theoretical base (relying on Maxwell’s equation) for Steinmetz’s Equation. In this sense, it cannot be simply neglected. It must be mentioned. Saksoy14 (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)