Talk:Stendal nuclear power plant

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Probably it shouldn´t have been closed

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

With increasing oil prices, and incereasing dependence from other nation´s natural resources, perhaps it was a bad idea closing this nuclear power plant....and probably it will be open again in the future. But, as the article says, part of it have been demolished so costs will be much higher than they could have been. A lot of money wasted for political reasons. Germany will depend more from French nuclear energy.--83.53.111.77 (talk) 01:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic