Talk:Stephen Juba

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stephen Juba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330155427/http://www.gov.mb.ca/hansard/members/mla_bio_deceased.html to https://www.gov.mb.ca/hansard/members/mla_bio_deceased.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Grounds for divorce

I believe the statement on the page about why Juba's first marriage ended in divorce should be removed.

First of all, the source cited is a court file, which probably violates WP:PRIMARY.

Secondly, even if the court file exists and does say what the article says it does, the information may not be true. In those days, there was no such thing as ending a marriage due to "irreconcilable differences." Grounds for divorce had to be proven in court. Since adultery was grounds for divorce everywhere, the easiest way to get a divorce was for the petitioner to discover the respondent at a motel with another party. This does not mean any actual adultery occurred; the other party was often a straw person who worked for the divorce lawyer and was there for the purpose of establishing grounds for divorce.

Thirdly, even if the information in the court file is true, it could be held to be defamatory of the other woman, who was never a public figure like Juba.

I post this here for discussion but have not made the edits yet. Bellczar (talk) 03:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)