Talk:Stephen L. Esquith
Latest comment: 3 years ago by PerpetuityGrat in topic Deletion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Deletion
editThis is one of several pages I have put up for deletion. All of these pages are by the same author (account now deleted), about professors from the same university. While I will assume good faith that it is not the school self-promoting, the fact remains that the only sources for notability on these articles are the professor's own publications and their personal pages on the university's website, which does not meet WP:NOTE. Therefore, I have proposed them for deletion, pending any genuine sources on their notability existing.2601:405:4400:9420:D086:AC36:FF13:3352 (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- As discussed elsewhere, Esquith has won awards for various reasons, but those reasons alone do not equate to notability. Across every reputable award-giving organizations, millions of people have received awards. The receipt of those awards does not make a living person notable, and I believe that is what is going on here. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)