Talk:Stephen Woodworth (politician)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Content regarding abortion legislation
editA recent edit added the following section:
Introducing the Motion, Woodworth insisted that Canadian law defining a human being “must absolutely be an honest law based on cogent evidence and sound principle.” Woodworth consistently maintained that politicians must tell the truth, based on up to date evidence and facts, on every issue, including abortion.The Motion proposed to create a special committee to review Canada's legal definition of human being, only reporting evidence received without making any recommendations.
As Stephen Woodworth is currently a political candidate, I strongly suspect that this content was written by a current campaign staffer to justify Mr. Woodworth's actions. Wikipedia is not the place for a living person to defend their actions --- and so I have reverted this edit. However, it keeps being re-added (by IP-based edits).
I'm looking for comments --- should this content remain or be removed? Marnevell (talk) 16:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)