Talk:Steve Blackman

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Hahahehepeepeepoopooman69 in topic Martial Arts Training

WWE

edit

I think he could make a good return to World Wrestling Entertainment. On RAW XV he looked like he was in the best shpe of his life. I think he sould consider returning to professional wrestling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.213.167.220 (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Martial Arts Training

edit

So... does Blackman actually have any real martial arts training and if so, why isn't it listed here? --JerryLewisOverdrive 23:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Old comment,but I just added it, and yes he does Hahahehepeepeepoopooman69 (talk) 22:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

BLP?!

edit

I fail to see what about that article violates WP:BLP. BLP policy holds that negative or controvercial material about living persons must be accurately sourced. It does not hold that ALL information about living persons must be swimming in citations. I'd appreciate if we could discuss what about the removed content is negative or controvercial here. Having this article say little more than "Steve Blackman is a living person" does not improve the encyclopedia. Croctotheface 20:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

There have been discussions at WP:AN, WP:ANI, WP:BLP, and other places and they have came to the concensus that any information that is uncited - controversial or not - may be removed at any time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fragilecreep (talkcontribs)

Allowing for removal of material ("may be removed") is not the same as mandating it. It is not even the same as saying that it works to the benefit of the encyclopedia to remove all such material. The most likely result of this is to reduce articles to shells and stubs without any meaningful information. In many cases, such as this one, I doubt that anyone will feel the need to go out and find sources to readd material that's removed under this rationale. I'm going to revert back pending a reason besides "the policy does not disallow what I did". Croctotheface 01:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why is this so empty?76.50.128.75 04:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Anyone else amused by the fact that Steve Blackman's WWF/WWE career was so bizarre that the entire article was deleted as vandalism? Maybe this will help. Online World of Wrestling Profile

What in the fuck......will someone please revert this O.o Падший ангел 06:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The top section about he's wrestling career.....

edit

I think it should be added because why else would he be on here, if not for he's wrestling. Just take out those stupid + signs you don't need those. Simple as that. --Crash Underride 16:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Crashunderride for populating the entry. And thanks to user Nat for unlocking it. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.54.71 (talk) 20:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Expansion plus.

edit

I've added references to the article, some external links, and made some minor edits. I have provided TWO videos references from SummerSlam 2000, that PROVES it was SHANE McMAHON who, lept off of the 30-40 foot jumbotron and NOT Steve Blackman. --Crash Underride 20:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Steve Blackman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply