| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Weasel tag removed
editI have removed the weasel tag because, having read the Recurring Motifs section, I have found it quite accurate and reliable. I mean it offers a fair description of what Erickson's novels are like, and it also offers a key to read and understand them. When it comes to a living author who is not very famous like Erickson, it is quite difficult to add footnotes to an article because the secondary bibliography does not exist. I know one should quote essays and articles and monographs written by authoritative critics telling us that Erickson is this and that, but such essays and articles and monographs do not exist yet. I do not doubt that sooner or later Erickson will be discovered by critics--especially academic critics, but this will take time; in the meantime we have to rely on the judgement of those Wikipedia readers and contributors who have read Erickson's fiction, and be a bit less nitpicking. Then, if someone else who's read Erickson's novels will find that something in the Recurring Motifs section is not accurate or is false, he will edit the text where it is needed, instead of calling in doubt the whole section, which is in my opinion unfair and misleading.--93.40.113.153 (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Questionable
editJust asking if "if he lives anywhere" at the end of bio section is referenced/based on anything besides atmospheric writing? Thanks, Manytexts (talk) 23:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)