| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
k-word debate
editA short piece on Hofmeyr's current stupid k-word discussion should be added.[1] 178.24.252.101 (talk) 16:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Discography
editThis article's discography section is particularly detailed (with each album's tracks being listed). It adds a lot of unnecessary length to the article, resulting in it becoming uncomfortable to read and navigate. Could the track listings not perhaps be omitted, or a separate Steve Hofmeyr Discography article be created? Knyzna1 (talk) 19:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think I've ever seen all the tracks of albums being included in discographies elsewhere on WP, so I agree that they should be removed here. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Impartiality
editThis article seriously needs to be checked for neutral point of view,especially " controversies " section,example " ... which has led various journalists and public figures to label him a "disgrace to South Africa " and it;s given source to a letter of protest from some guy,that's way bellow factual standards of wikipedia . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.40.10.122 (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)