Talk:Steven Beseau
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Maximilian775 in topic Tweet Evidence for Ordination by +Keleher
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Tweet Evidence for Ordination by +Keleher
edithttps://twitter.com/beseausteve/status/1270738200227651587?s=61&t=HGwmsu9U8lPdVq9MyiOChQ This tweet clearly shows Beseau being ordained a priest by James Patrick Keleher, but I am unsure as to whether it is usable as a source for that information? Having the bishop who ordained a priest listed on an article, while not vital, would be a great addition. Maximilian775 (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- No. IMO, tweets are even lower than blogs as far as credibility, dependability, verifiability, or anything else that would make them of value to WP goes. Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree. There is something to be said for the fact that the photo appears to depict Beseau, and the account appears to be run by Beseau himself, but... Maximilian775 (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- No. IMO, tweets are even lower than blogs as far as credibility, dependability, verifiability, or anything else that would make them of value to WP goes. Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)