Talk:Stochastic universal sampling
Latest comment: 13 years ago by KitBarnes in topic RWS function inconsistency
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stochastic universal sampling article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Better Explanation
edithttp://watchmaker.uncommons.org/manual/ch03s02.html Intellec7 (talk) 23:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
RWS function inconsistency
editIn its definition, RWS has two input arguments. In it's invocation within SUS, it is passed only a single argument. I think that the RWS function is being used incorrectly and possibly defined incorrectly. Intellec7 (talk) 23:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
RWS as defined will also fail if any individual would appear twice, I'm not entirely sure this can happen however, haven't thought much about it. KitBarnes (talk) 13:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)