Talk:Street children in India/GA1

GA Review

Reviewer: Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk · contribs) 09:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

External Links

Hello! I was reviewing the lead section and I believe you need to work on providing the exact location in the external links where those citations are present. Take for example for the definition of street child in India:"for whom the street (in the widest sense of the word, including unoccupied dwellings, wasteland, etc.) has become his or her habitual abode and/or source of livelihood; and who is inadequately protected, supervised, or directed by responsible adults”. But I could not find the definition in the external link mentioned for the same.Same applies to other links as well. I will get back to you in a week. Thanks. Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

Hi, the article needs to work upon on the following points:

1) In the section mentioned above, I have queried about the exact location of the definition of the street child in the external link. However, it hasn't been worked upon. It violates the Factually accurate and verifiable property of the good article criteria.

2) The lead section of the article is inadequate and needs expansion. It violates the manual of styles for the lead section of the well written criteria of a good article.

3) Please act upon the link no 1 in the references section. The external link is the home page of a website. However, specific locations or pointers are needed to verify the claims.

The article was put on hold for more than a week, awaiting user inputs. But, no comments were received. I believe these should be worked upon before re-nominating the article for GA. The article is close to the GA.

Status: Fail

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Quality of article is good.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   MoS non-compliant section: Lead section

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   This section is good.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Lacks pointers to the exact location of references in the external links. Citations, in such a case, are highly debatable.

   C. No original research:

   Unavailable pointers to the references makes it appear as an original research.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   All major aspects of the topic are covered.

   B. Focused:

   Article remains focused on the topic throughout.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias found.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article is stable.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   No problem with images

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Appropriate Images provided

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Fail 25 June 2012