Talk:Street hierarchy
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Street hierarchy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merger Discussion
editRequest received to merge articles: Hierarchy of roads to here; dated June 2015. Rationale: I think that both of the articles are about a similar topic and they have similar information. Bubby33 (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Don't Merge While they have similar names, Street Hierarchy and Hierarchy of Roads are completely different subjects. The former is a system of urban (or rather suburban) planning and the latter is a system of classifying roads. To merge the two would be completely nonsensical. -Lamarcus (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Street Circulation of Anthem, Arizona.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
|
An image used in this article, File:Street Circulation of Anthem, Arizona.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
| Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC) |
what the hell is "TND"
editthe abbreviation "TND" is used repetitively throughout the article, yet I can't find a single reference to what the hell "TND" stands for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.38.142.214 (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Less street length or more?
editIn the Financial costs section, there is this sentence:
- Some planners and economists consider the street hierarchy to be financially wasteful, since it requires more miles of street to be laid than a grid plan to serve a much smaller population.
But then there's this, in the same section:
- Studies show that regular, undifferentiated grid patterns generally incur infrastructure costs about 20 to 30 percent higher than the discontinuous hiererchical street patterns, reflecting an analogous street length increase.
The first says hierarchy produces more street length, the second says grid produces more street length. So which is it? C xong (talk) 00:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)