Talk:Stride & Prejudice

My recommendations

@Abryn: I think it would be better to use the app icon for the infobox and finding a gameplay screenshot to place in the gameplay section. In my humble opinion, I recommend a gif so people can have a good understanding of what the gameplay is. Unfortunately, I don't own an iPhone. If this came out on android, I can record the gameplay myself and create a gif out of it. I also can't find any video of the gameplay either. If you have any video footage available online, let me know and I'll create a gif for it.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 21:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Sadly, I can't find any videos of the game. That said, it is available on Android. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

@Abryn: Unfortunately, i can't find it in the Google play store.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Huh. I could have sworn that I downloaded it. Must have dreamed that, haha. Oh well, thanks for offering to help in that area anyway. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

maybe it was delisted as i can't even find it in the Apple store.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stride & Prejudice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 01:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

{{doing}} Look for a review at the end of this weekend. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 01:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

• Content:
  • No apparent issues with stability and neutrality (4,5)
  • There is a {{clarification needed}} tag that needs to be addressed.
  • The reception section needs work. Right now it's just a laundry list of "Person X from Publication Y said Z" rather than synthesizing those critic opinions into something cohesive.
  • I think the gameplay section could use a little more fleshing out. It's not made explicit that Elizabeth is running along the text, and until I dug into the sources I didn't really know that the running is automatic.
• Images::
  • File:Stride and Prejudice.png has an improper fair use rationale; it's talking about the logo of the game but the logo is probably public domain as simple text, you have to justify using the splash screen/promo art/what have you.
• References::
  • The big question to me is whether this topic at 650 words including the lead is broad enough for GA status. I'm inclined to think it's not at present; given that length isn't a concern there's more detail that could be added.
  • A quick search for sources brought up [1][2][3] on the first page of Google results, and that's not checking News, Scholar, Books, or any library databases. I normally wouldn't think an exhaustive perusal of available sources is needed, but considering how short the article is I think you need proportionately more.

--Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 19:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• • • Will get to these soon. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

@David Fuchs: I'm gonna withdraw the GA for now, use what you said to help improve the article for a possible renomination. Thanks for the suggestions, it's much appreciated. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 17:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Okay, good luck. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 19:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)