Talk:Structured cabling/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Structured cabling. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Image
Although humorous, this image is not encyclopedic! Replace w/ more suitable one. Unfortunately, I don't have access to a datacentre that I can photograph, so somebody will have to do it or select an existing one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.161.22.188 (talk) 07:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC).
Hows that? --Hamish (Talk) 18:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- A fish-eye picture isn't encyclopedic either. 89.1.142.104 (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I've seen ALOT worse than that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.167.136 (talk) 04:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Home Use
I'm trying to find information about the rack mounting system in my home cabinet, but I keep only seeing information on 19" rack mounts. I'm sure the mounts in my home system are smaller, somewhere on the order of 5 or 6". Can anyone provide details? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.53.228.139 (talk) 21:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- This is not google, you should try looking there. That said, the standard rack sizes are 19 and 23 inch, you're talking about a custom or local job, not a standardized one. It would not be covered here.dunerat (talk) 10:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think the poster above is asking about a "Structured Media Cabinet" (SMC) or "structured media enclosure", which have become extremely common in residential installations. The spacing between the vertical rows of holes in many of these cabinets would be about 5-6". There are about a half dozen different "standards" for these cabinets, each with the backing of at least one (or a small group) of manufacturers. Ultimately, we probably need an entire dedicated article for this subject. --Tothwolf (talk) 11:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)