Talk:Stuart Davis (painter)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expanding Stuart Davis' page
editI have done a bunch of research on Stuart Davis from in mentors and inspirations to his style of art and quotes. If you look back to the edit history for Stuart Davis, you will be able to find my proposed changes. The majority of my edits come from American Painter: Stuart Davis, which was published by the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Other sources were found using the Oscar database. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K3sullivan (talk • contribs) 23:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Everything added must be in your own words, everything must be referenced and leave the infobox intact...Modernist (talk) 02:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Everything is in my own words. Except the quotes in the quote section. Is that part not OK and what about the other sections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by K3sullivan (talk • contribs) 00:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- The quotes were ok, give it a try...Modernist (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Modernist - what's your problem? See Artforum 11/16, p. 278 for my comments about last work Fin which you deleted. Sufferingsurfer (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Complaint
editWhile this article is informative, the article content is not compliant with the Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy. The introduction defends criticism of Davis, without adequately presenting the reasons for the critics to take this position, or exactly what the found in the art that would lead them to conclude it is marxist (or accuse him of communist leanings). I'm a fan of Davis, but the article is defensive, and dismissive of contrary opinions.
John Furbucket2016 (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- It's a terrific article in spite of your complaint...Modernist (talk) 21:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Liberator
editI do not think the link to "Liberator" is to the right publication of this name. There would seem to be no reason for this painter to be connected to the youth magazine of the British Liberal Democrats, which was founded in 1970. However, I thought it would be better to post this than to just "be bold in this instance. 2600:1004:B156:38A:645C:9720:7216:2C5E (talk) 03:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)