Talk:Stuart Feldman

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Resuna in topic Tale of design mistake lock in?

Tale of design mistake lock in?

edit

My fuzzy recollection is Feldman wrote something describing how he quickly (weeks?) concluded that using significant tabs had been a mistake. But how at that point, he had too many users, order 10?, to change it. Now, order 10_000+ users later... It's a cautionary tale for any protocol designer. And I'd really love to find a reference. 66.30.119.55 19:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

This seems to have been a common rationale at Bell Labs. I had a discussion some years back with Dennis Ritchie about a detail of the C programming language, and he said that he agreed it was a mistake but by the time they realized it there were more than three sites running C so they decided not to change it. -- Resuna (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Cross-posted on Talk:Make and Talk:Stuart Feldman.

One reference is Eric S. Raymond's The Art of Unix Programming, which appears in print and in freely downloadable form. JöG 20:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


Note: a pic of Feldman can be found at: [[1]] Also note that he is responsible for one of the greatest travesties in the history of programming languages significant whitespace (TAB on the beggining of a line) Incredibly, this mistake has been repeated in several modern languages, including Python and Ruby —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.184.3 (talk) 22:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stuart Feldman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply