Talk:Students Harness Aid for the Relief of the Elderly

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleStudents Harness Aid for the Relief of the Elderly has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

edit

I myself am a member of SHARE, and so I feel a lot more can be done with this article.I'll do what I can myself, but any contributions would be helpful

GA review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

A few prose tweaks and some explanations of terminology are the big issues, as well as a few more sentences in the lede

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    just a few tweaks on the prose and the lede
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    A couple of citations for some quotations
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    A few places where an explanation of terms would be helpful
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Logo needs a fair use rationale for the page, and I'm slightly concerned about the number of fair use images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Details:

  • Lede could use a bit more information in it. Consider adding a bit more about the collection period and/or information on the other support provided by the organization.
  • A number of the paragraphs are short, only one, two or three sentences. Consider expanding a bit or merging them with other paragraphs to keep the prose from feeling choppy.
  • Being a yank, I don't know what an An Taoiseach is. Consider a quick explanation so that folks don't have to leave your article to figure out what the word is.
  • History section, first paragraph, the quotation "elegant buildings.." needs a citation on it. I assume that the two quotations at the end of the paragraph are from the same source, consider combining them and using ... in the middle. As it is now, it reads awkwardly.
  • As a pure formatting issue, the MOS frowns on putting two linked items next to each other, I'm not going to fail the article on it, but if you're heading towards FA with this, be aware of it.
  • Facilities section - what is sheltered housing?
  • Recognition section, what's the TD after Michael Martin mean?
  • I assume Br. means Brother, and that Br. Jerome was a monk? Might make that explicit.
  • Logo needs a specific fair use rationale for this page.
  • I am a bit concerned with the number of fair use images. While I won't fail the article on this, consider trying to find a couple of free images for the buildings at least. I'm no expert on fair use policy, so all I can say is that using fewer fair use images is always better.
  • I don't see a controversy section. Given the mission of the charity, I'm going to assume there aren't any controversies, and that if there were you'd have covered them. This isn't exactly the type of charity that attracts controversy after all.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.Ealdgyth | Talk 16:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixes

edit
First of all, thank you for your thorough review of this article. I have begun by dealing with the basic, minor details, which I have also taken the liberty of marking above. Per the article history:
  • I have used Prime Minister of Ireland to introduce the term "An Taoiseach". In my experience, the Taoiseach is only rarely referred to by the former within Ireland, but I have seen it used in English and American newspapers (being a fairly accurate description of his office).
  • Sheltered housing is a concept which has its own article on Wikipedia, so only a link was necessary.
  • "TD" stands for "Teachta Dála" - a member of Dáil Éireann, the Irish Parliament. I have added a link should the reader require any further clarification.
  • Brother Jerome was not a monk per se, but he was a member of a religious order - the Presentation Brothers specifically. Again, I have added a link to make that clearer.
I will be moving onto the other issues in good time. --Editor of Podium 2008 (talk) 00:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Further issues (Revision history):


I have expanded the lede (Revision history) and rewritten a specific rationale for Image:SHARE-logo.png. The remaining issues are:
  • The minor Manual of Style points you mentioned.
  • Fair-use images. My long term aim for articles that I work on is to use free images, and in the future I should be able to replace the Day Care Centre image with something else.
  • Lastly, you are right in your assumptions; there are no controversies of which I am aware.
I think I have dealt with all the main points you have detailed, so feel free to re-read and assess the article. --Editor of Podium 2008 (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks great! Passing it now! Ealdgyth | Talk 02:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Free" Pictures

edit

The launch of the 2009 SHARE collection is this evening, and will run up until Christmas, so now would be a good time to get "free" pictures to replace some of the "fair use" images (mainly that of the Preslink Choir). --Editor of Podium 2008 (talk) 14:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:ShareCribPatricksStreet.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:ShareCribPatricksStreet.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 12 June 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:ShareCribPatricksStreet.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Students Harness Aid for the Relief of the Elderly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Students Harness Aid for the Relief of the Elderly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply