Talk:Studio Trigger

Why is the article name "Studio Trigger" if it's simply something they're "also known as?"

Additionally, the previous name was "Trigger (company)". Unlike Studio Deen, it's not in the company's name, and the artice acknowledges it as something "also known as." While there are companies that have a different trade name, this doesn't seem to be the case here. Gainax is also refered to as Studio Gainax on the internet, etc.160.177.42.72 (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

It's a matter of common name. If you go through the sources, they mostly use the name "Studio Trigger", even the Kickstarter page uses that name. —Farix (t | c) 11:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 19 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — mw (talk) (contribs) 22:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

---

Studio Trigger → Trigger (animation studio) – Trigger is the right name, everybody knows. Here are some sources. Please look at them. It can't be moved to Trigger (studio), I don't know why, so Trigger (animation studio) is the right choice, like other Japanese animation studios names here on Wikipedia, such as Orange (animation studio).

Sources:

https://trigger-global.ecq.sc/

https://www.st-trigger.co.jp/news/1591/

https://www.st-trigger.co.jp/about/

https://myanimelist.net/anime/producer/803/Trigger

And many many more. Fleyzk (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

• Oppose; WP:COMMONNAME says Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources) (emphasis mine). Of the sources you link above, the first is a retailer (not independent), the second and third are written in Japanese (not English-language) , and the fourth is to MyAnimeList, which is unreliable per WP:MYANIMELIST. Meanwhile, the name "Studio Trigger" has been widely used by Kotaku, Crunchyroll News, CBR, Screen Rant, Collider, Polygon, IGN, and Anime News Network articles within the past year or two ([1], [2]). All of those are independent and at least somewhat reliable English-language sources that use "Studio Trigger". I fail to see how this is not the WP:COMMONNAME. Link20XX (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

• Oppose, per Link20XX's comment. Xexerss (talk) 03:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose WP:NATURAL, as well as the WP:COMMONNAME. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose per Link20XX, note WP:OFFICIALNAMES which isn't to be used, instead we use WP:COMMONNAME. Additionally the existing title is a WP:NATURALDAB. This article cannot be manually moved to Trigger (studio) because it already exists as a redirect, but if you propose "Trigger (studio)" instead and this discussion moves to support, then the technical issue can be overidden and it moved to Trigger (studio) (not supporting such a move rn, but it can be overriden if there is support). DankJae 23:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.