This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Amj55 (talk·contribs) / Studyhall This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here)
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 11 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion
The article currently has only one inline citation. The other references aren't explicitly associated with specific bits of text, so I'm reinstating the {{no footnotes}} tag within the 'FeaturesReferences' section. I hope this makes sense. -- Trevj (talk) 14:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Yes, that's probably the one I should've used at the top. Sorry. So it's either a case of replacing tags or just keeping with the 'no footnotes' in the refs section... until someone checks through the refs and tidies things, of course! -- Trevj (talk) 21:49, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi everyone. I am trying to improve the inline citations in the article. Do you have advice as to exactly how many I should include? I have tried to back up most of the information. Also, is there any way to help the article meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines? Thank you for all you do in maintaining Wikipedia and helping others improve articles. Amj55 (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Everyone. Thanks for all you do. I am the intern who created the article. I declared my affiliation with Studyhall and was helped by people in Tea house, and then the article was moved to article space so I figured everything was fine. Is there anything I can do about the flags on the article page about my conflict of interest? Thanks so much for your guidance! Amj55 (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have removed the COI tag on the article itself for now. You have willingly declared it on your own, and seem very happy to work with us on how to improve the article. Thusly, the COI shouldn't be put out there for the average reader to see (in my opinion). You won't be able to get rid of the conflict, but you can certainly work around it, as you are willing to do. I can't really provide a lot of details on improvements right now, but more sources seem to be what some people want. Also, please beware that if you stop cooperating or otherwise anger another editor, they have the right to add the COI tag back. Thanks for being willing to work with us! gwickwire | Leave a message23:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
