Talk:Subaru Tribeca
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
The front of this car
editreminds me of a Chrysler while the back reminds me of a Hyundai. What's with that?! (DeathShot39 (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC))
MAKE THE ARTICLE BETTER OR LEAVE IT ALONE
editTHIS ARTICLE IS A MESS AND I'M TRYING TO FIX IT. Information about this vehicle was duplicated in multiple sections, the grammar was in present tense about a past vehicle and despite the major physical changes, IFCAR insists on posting a photo that is incorrect for the 2008 version, because he likes it better, without reading the article. So FUCK THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THIS ARTICLE
This article has also been restructured for future contributions, with a lead article. Subaru will eventually change this vehicle with a new generation and I'm trying to structure the article for future contributions. (Dddike (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC))
- Its just had facelift, when is the next generation coming....? its better with one box, it isnt so big job to add new infobox when new generation arrives, there is certain rules to those infoboxes....when it has two boxes it looks like it already has two generations. --— Typ932T | C 20:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- An image can't be "incorrect." There is no policy that the head image must or even should be the latest car, but quality is certainly an obvious concern. You aren't making the article better by putting a poor image at the top, so by your own advice, leave it alone. Stop reverting. IFCAR (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- You just don't get it, and I will not argue with a fool (Dddike (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC))
- An image can't be "incorrect." There is no policy that the head image must or even should be the latest car, but quality is certainly an obvious concern. You aren't making the article better by putting a poor image at the top, so by your own advice, leave it alone. Stop reverting. IFCAR (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Its just had facelift, when is the next generation coming....? its better with one box, it isnt so big job to add new infobox when new generation arrives, there is certain rules to those infoboxes....when it has two boxes it looks like it already has two generations. --— Typ932T | C 20:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)