Talk:Subcomandante Marcos
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Subcomandante Marcos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Subcomandante Marcos. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Subcomandante Marcos at the Reference desk. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: "The Zapatista Struggle Continues (1994– )" section
editThis is a very oddly structured section that gives very little actual detail on the subject matter, instead listing numerous events that Marcos has attended, without any further context being given. The sources cited are also largely from the Enlace Zapatista, which should be clear is not a reliable source. I think this subsection needs to be completely redone in order to provide actual information about Marcos' activities post-1994, possibly changing the heading to something more appropriate, or else it should be removed entirely. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I am the author of this section. My purpose was to produce a brief picture of all the events that Marcos took part in so as to show the extent of his role as spokesperson and (for want of a better word) "front man" for the Zapatistas. I take the point made by Grnrchst, in that the purpose of this section is perhaps not made clear, so I intend to alter that in a week or so, but I feel that entirely removing the whole section is too much (throwing the baby out with the bathwater indeed!). Finally, I see no problem with the source (stated above as being Enlace Zapatista) as what is listed here are simple facts (dates, venues, event names), and these are all attested to by other sources (most often journalists reporting in La Jornada) and are not contested by anyone. Lucerito1957 (talk) 06:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- I have now completed the rewrite of the introduction to this section. Lucerito1957 (talk) 07:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- I see that this section was deleted despite my above justification for writing (and re-writing) it. Since Grnrchst (talk) did not engage in the discussion above, but simply waited a while and then deleted this section, I have re-instated it. However, to address the concerns of Grnrchst (talk) I have moved the actual list of events to an Appendix.
- Without this section on the Zapatista struggle continuing, a reader would have no idea of what Marcos did in the nearly 20 years from 1995 to now. Worse, it would give the impresion he had been inactive, when nothing could be further from the truth.
- As for sources, these have been added, but there is really no doubt that these events took place. Enlace Zapatista may not be a neutral source, but it contains photographs and recordings from these events, proving that they actually took place and that Marcos was present, which is all that is being claimed in the article. Lucerito1957 (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, apologies, I didn't see this. I agree that the article does need to be something to display Marcos' recent activities, but I still don't think this list is it. While its purpose is clearer, it still doesn't communicate actual solid information about his activities, it just lists events he showed up to. What level of participation did he have? What did he say about them? Why were these events important to his biography? These are the kind of things I don't think are easily communicated in a simple list. I'm happy to leave this up for now, until a better alternative section can be written, but I think this is a case where using prose would be a lot more helpful for the reader than a timeline. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- The list is not simply of "events Marcos showed up to". As the preamble makes clear, it is a list of events that were either convened by the Zapatistas and where Marcos played a major role by presiding over them and often initiating, organizing, or orchestrating them, or were put on by other organizations at which Marcos acted as representative of and spokesperson for, the Zapatistas. I feel it gives a snapshot of the sheer amount of such activities and endeavors undertaken by Marcos on behalf of the Zapatistas, which in turn gives an insight into his importance within the movement. If you feel this is still not satisfactory, I am happy to discuss this further. Henck’s Subcomandante Marcos, Global Rebel Icon contains a quite thorough timeline of such events up to 2018 that the reader here could instead be pointed to after a short prose discussion. Lucerito1957 (talk) 11:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, apologies, I didn't see this. I agree that the article does need to be something to display Marcos' recent activities, but I still don't think this list is it. While its purpose is clearer, it still doesn't communicate actual solid information about his activities, it just lists events he showed up to. What level of participation did he have? What did he say about them? Why were these events important to his biography? These are the kind of things I don't think are easily communicated in a simple list. I'm happy to leave this up for now, until a better alternative section can be written, but I think this is a case where using prose would be a lot more helpful for the reader than a timeline. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Appendix section
editMoving this section from the article to this talk page for safe-keeping. It's possible this can be used as a timeline of some sort but it would need to be sourced to reliable, secondary sources if note worthy. It's currently mostly sourced to unreliable and primary sources.
Extended content
|
---|
References
|
- Could you please engage with the above discussion between myself and Grnrchst (talk) on this matter. There, the question of sources was adressed, and even if this issue was not resolved to your satisfaction, some indication that you have read this, and have some form of argument against the assertion that the sources are reliable (at least regarding their attesting to Marcos being present, in the roles ascribed, at these events) would be appreicated. The case for the inclusion of this list of events is also made above. Again, you are perfectly at liberty to diagree on the matter of this section's usefulness/significance, but affording some reason why (e.g. it's in list format, you don't agree that it shows what Marcos has been doing in more recent years) would be helpful. Thanks Lucerito1957 (talk) 10:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Lucerito1957, if these are noteworthy events, we would expect them to be covered in reliable, independent, secondary sources. If the event is noteworthy, more than just providing a timeline of these events (which we typically do not do for biographies), we should be using those secondary sources to explain to a general audience in prose what import those events had on Marcos's life, since this is a biography. Simply listing events associated with Marcos isn't within Wikipedia's scope, even as an appendix.
- Also Wikipedia follows a principle of Bold, Revert, Discuss, meaning that editors are encouraged to be bold, but if their edits are challenged/reverted, the standard is to remove the content, bringing that section to the talk page until there is consensus to re-add it. czar 23:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi czar,
- to respond to your points:
- 1) these events are attested to in reliable secondary sources in many instances (e.g. the Mexican daily La Jornada).
- 2) I can't speak for Wikipedia biographies, but plenty of published (i.e. book-format) biographies contain timelines (they are widely perceived to be quite useful)
- 3) it is not claimed that these events had import on Marcos' life; rather, Marcos impacted these events (a legitimate aspect of biography is, after all, how a person shaped circumstances / events, not just how circumstances / events shaped a person)
- 4) the problem with the Bold, Revert, Discuss policy being adopted in this particular instance is that a reasonably informative (but admittedly by no means optimum) section that prevents the misleading impression being formed that Marcos ceased being active many years ago has now been removed, with a yawning gap being left in its place. (My own policy is not to delete material that another editor has contributed unless it is factually incorrect or wholly irrelevant: I believe neither to be the case in this instance.) In short, it is too easy for one editor to simply remove input by another editor and leave nothing in its place. I have absolutely no problem with the material in the Appendix being replaced with prose - in fact, I very much welcome it! - but unless you (or someone else) are prepared to do this, or, more accurately, until you (or someone else) are prepared to do this, then I personally believe it is better (i.e. more informative for readers) to have the timeline than simply nothing after circa 2014.
- That being said, I am not going to reinstate the material for fear of going back and forth on this. Lucerito1957 (talk) 10:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- If the events are discussed in reliable, secondary sources as noteworthy in Marcos's life, we should cite those rather than primary sources and incorporate that detail into his general biography. If after that expansion, there is a separate need to split out specific instances into a timeline, we can discuss, but traditionally that is not a format used in Wikipedia biographies, since we're focusing on writing the actual biography. Note that other Wikipedia biographies may have timelines for major conflicts but rarely for an individual's biography. I.e., if this would be better put as a timeline of the Chiapas conflict, I think that would have a greater chance of fitting, but even then we should start with prose and not the timeline. We disagree on whether a timeline with primary sources is a better interim replacement than nothing. I think it makes the article confusing. An alternative is to take the reliable, indepenent, secondary sources that you mention discussing these topics and putting them in the Further reading section both for reader reference and future expansion. czar 12:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. The timeline was introduced with a paragraph of prose explaining its purpose, so I don’t think it made the article confusing at all. (I agree that we don’t need a timeline if a prose account of the post-2014 years is included: the current timeline is intended as a stop gap.) Personally, I still maintain that a reader is better served by having even poorly presented facts at their disposal than by being confronted with a total absence of data, but I guess readers will just have to go and search out for themselves the existence of any post-2014 courses of action undertaken by Marcos…at least until someone fills the gap with something other than the timeline that I produced. I don’t envisage having time myself to produce a prose account any time soon: I therefore very much hope someone else will undertake this work. Lucerito1957 (talk) 10:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- If the events are discussed in reliable, secondary sources as noteworthy in Marcos's life, we should cite those rather than primary sources and incorporate that detail into his general biography. If after that expansion, there is a separate need to split out specific instances into a timeline, we can discuss, but traditionally that is not a format used in Wikipedia biographies, since we're focusing on writing the actual biography. Note that other Wikipedia biographies may have timelines for major conflicts but rarely for an individual's biography. I.e., if this would be better put as a timeline of the Chiapas conflict, I think that would have a greater chance of fitting, but even then we should start with prose and not the timeline. We disagree on whether a timeline with primary sources is a better interim replacement than nothing. I think it makes the article confusing. An alternative is to take the reliable, indepenent, secondary sources that you mention discussing these topics and putting them in the Further reading section both for reader reference and future expansion. czar 12:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also Wikipedia follows a principle of Bold, Revert, Discuss, meaning that editors are encouraged to be bold, but if their edits are challenged/reverted, the standard is to remove the content, bringing that section to the talk page until there is consensus to re-add it. czar 23:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Death
editas per the communique published last year, sup Galeano (prior Marcos) has died in october of 2023. Additionally, the communique is signed as "Capitan Insurgente Marcos". The cause is not mentioned in the text. Possible post-mortem title change?
original communique in spanish https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2023/10/29/segunda-parte-los-muertos-estornudan/ english translation https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2023/10/30/second-part-do-dead-people-sneeze/ 31.183.158.137 (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- See [7]. It doesn't seem he's actually dead. It's just symbolic.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)