Untitled

edit

This ride used to be at the Magic Kingdom in Disney World in Florida. Someone needs to make mention of that. Buzda 10:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Info

edit

So, we have a comprehensive listing of the names of every sub in the attraction, but virtually no description of the attraction itself? A sentence or two about auctioning off the original parts of the attraction is not what belongs under "Original Attraction." That info needs to be in a trivia section, along with the info about the live mermaids. We need a more detailed explanation of the ride itself, from someone with a lot more information that what's here. PacificBoy 17:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

i agree, the sub voyage was one of my favorite rides before i got into roller coasters and before it closed when i was eight. id love to help on the article, but everything i could say(which is almost nothing at all) has already been said. i do, however, think that there were some audio animatronic mermaids at one point in the ride, and i think either an orca or a sperm whale fighting a giant squid in the arctic portion, as well as an earthquake type portion where there were some Atlantis-like pillars wobbling and also a volcano.

at the very least, id like there to be a list of all the animals and other notable features of it(like the volcano, if there was one) and how they appear. as an example, one could be:

this was a fantastic ride, perfect for ride-goers of all ages. now they have that stupid Finding Nemo attraction that perfect for ride-goers 6-and-under. what about the rest of us?! Brontoraptor 09:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


UPDATE!!! after a quick search on my browser, i found this URL: http://www.yesterland.com/submarine.html . its a whole web page that vaguely describes the ride, but it may be of some help.

Fair use rationale for Image:SubPoster.JPG

edit
 

Image:SubPoster.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Attraction statistics

edit

I am skeptical about two of the statistics shown for this attraction -- Length 52 ft and Track height 1568 ft. I assume that these should be Vehicle length 52 ft and Track length 1568 ft, but I'm unclear on how to make the change. Dcwaterboy (talk) 16:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Submarine Voyage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Submarine Voyage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply