This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
User:Alcherin I got a new idea: all the submarine actions taking place near the Romanian coast. What I did so far is very rough, will refine in a few days. Unless you want to make adjustments, which I would gladly welcome. 79.113.129.252 (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Well the main 3 engagements got 3 sources each (forgot to add for Jibrieni, will do tomorrow) and I can even provide more if really required. Curacao Bombardment has only 2 sources, if I recall correctly, and still no notability Issues there. Anyway, I'll ponder what we'll do, maybe include all of the Black Sea submarine campaign, with mine warfare and such. Something like Axis anti-submarine warfare in the Black Sea. The reason I'm pushing this is that submarines were by far the most numerous warship losses in the Black Sea, 17 Soviet submarines were lost out of 44, so I consider they deserve their own article. Yes, Black Sea Campaigns, emphasis on the plural. This would be the submarine campaign. In ultimate instance, I would agree adding the actions to the BSC article, but you would have to do it, for I am bound to be reverted if I try. 2A02:2F08:6040:81F:7999:D8DA:2DDE:69AD (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's not only about the number of sources but the extent to which relevant detail is discussed in those sources (i.e. extensive coverage in reliable sources). To separate out an article specifically on submarines in the Black Sea would require that there are reliable sources that specifically deal with this topic, preferably giving it some sort of name. Historical significance (in terms of Soviet submarine losses) don't by themselves establish notability, but historical significance does usually mean that it will have been discussed in extensive detail in reliable sources. Alcherin (talk) 08:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
I understand, and frankly, I will think things accordingly eventually. Meanwhile, as a stop-gap meausre, I added the Mangalia battle to Operation Munchen, and the Danube battles at Chilia branch. I am preparing for university, so really I will have little time for editing in the near future, thus I'm afraid I have to put article creation on hold for the time being, or at least be discontinued. 86.120.125.199 (talk)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Legacypac: Article title has yet to be determined. The IP editor involved took an old draft and changed the content to include much more than the original scope of the title. As such I do not believe it is ready for publication into mainspace. Ping other involved editors K.e.coffman and Sulfurboy. Alcherin (talk) 02:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ya this was a page up for G13 deletion. It looked to be worth a second look. I've got
.jpg)
.svg){kind=small}
