Talk:Suburbs of Thuringowa City
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 March 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep, and possibly merge. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
WHY
editTell me why this page is to be deleted....Thuringowa is a city and will be until March 08 so after this time you can have your way but until then this page is a part of Thuringowacity and needs to be kept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thuringowacityrep (talk • contribs) 10:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
this is a joke
editok tell me people why it is that this page is alway up for deletion when it is fact and is about the suburbs of a city, ok the city may be ending after March this year but that is not a reasion to delete it now, if you look at the List of the suburbs of Townsville you will see that this page is set out the same way and yet the Townsville one is ok. untill the city of Thuringowa is no more this page needs to say here as it is a ref point for the city of Thuringowa page, just like the Townsville list is linked to the Towsnville city page, it is about time you people stoped picking on me and Thuringowa as it is really getting petty now.Thuringowacityrep (talk) 03:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- You do realise btw that we don't have a page like this for any other LGAs? Orderinchaos 03:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- townsville city does and that is an LGA Thuringowacityrep (talk) 05:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS seems to deal with your issue there. I may not know much about the the City of Thuringowa, or its suburbs, thats why we have criteria, specifically set out so that we can know a topic is notable, eg. WP:N. This article, in its current state does not appear to meet any WP notability criteria. Its scope is plain small and the article appears to be part of a very large walled-garden that has become of the City of Thuringowa article. Twenty Years 15:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)