Talk:Successor cardinal
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Arthur Rubin in topic Without choice?
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Successor cardinal and Hartogs number
editIsn't the definition provided at the end of current revision (as a definition without AC)
- .
the same thing as the Hartogs number?
- Kompik: Yes, it is. Please sign your contributions to talk with four tildas, e.g. ~~~~. JRSpriggs 03:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Without choice?
editDo we want to include the following results:
If is any cardinal, then (Hartogs number) is a smallest cardinal m such that (Already included, in part.)
If Dedekind finite, then is the successor cardinal of .
I believe I can show that if is Dedekind infinite, then is a successor cardinal of , but I don't have a reference.
Hence, any cardinal has a successor cardinal. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:32, 22 June 2015 (UTC)