Talk:Sucharit Bhakdi

Lot of citations needed. Article needs rewording and changes.

Quite some of the statements in this Wikipedia article are worded in a way that is very biased towards an unpopular opinion that is partly plain wrong and partly fairly dubious, which is just strengthened by the fact that this article is worded like it's an article made by Bild, and on top of that locked for corrections.

He was not a source of misinformation, but rather an independent source of research just as other independent researchers and sources such as Dr. Botha.

Also his antisemitic statements were not antisemitic whatsoever and is just plain wrong. 46.128.215.37 (talk) 14:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

an independent source of research What research is that? In which peer-reviewed scientific journal did he publish it? If he did not, it is not research but opinion. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Research isn't research until a gatekeeper provides a stamp of approval. AardvarkAdevărul (talk) 22:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, that is the nature of science. One person cannot do science; someone else has to check it. Your point was? --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

That one is far less likely to be published if holding a heterodox opinion. No one said anything about "one person." Your point was? AardvarkAdevărul (talk) 11:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

My point was to ask what your point was. Your point seems to be that Bhakdi's ideas are unlikely to be published in a scientific journal because they are "heterodox". (Actually, they are heterodox because he has no good justification for them, and they are unlikely to be published in a scientific journal because he has no good justification for them.)

This page is not a forum but only for improving the article, see WP:NOTFORUM. The only fact relevant here is that he has not published. Why he has not done that - your "gatekeeper"/"heterodox" speculation - does not belong here. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

The parenthetical "(even though Germany typically has more deaths due to pollution than Italy)" definitely needs a citation. I have no argument as whether or not it is true, but, if true, it should be fairly easy for whoever wrote this to find a statistic from a reputable source that could be cited. AardvarkAdevărul (talk) 11:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Correct as found by Dr Grundmann, the judge in the case against Dr Bhakdi. 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Was found not guilty

He was found not guilty, maybe you can clean up the smearing… 2A02:A03F:6946:2A00:4D24:1431:38A3:EF98 (talk) 00:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Nothing was changed? Why? The term misinformation is not appropriate. 2603:7080:D53B:B3B8:2011:E519:63D2:6485 (talk) 00:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

What are you even on about? Bon courage (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Hatchet job description

The description is extremely biased misinformation that takes away credibility of the site. Real science welcomes debate and discussion. 96.48.125.176 (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

If you have reliable sources that confirm that the article contains misinformation, bring them, Until then, we prefer the reliable sources we already use to your unfounded opinion. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Correct. Subsequent findings that lockdowns and masks were a total waste of time. This article needs correcting on many points that are factually incorrect. 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

A newly released report from Florida's grand jury investigating COVID-19 protocols is making waves with its findings on the effectiveness of masks and lockdowns.

Governor Ron DeSantis announced his plans to petition the state Supreme Court to convene a grand jury to investigate, “any and all wrongdoing in Florida with respect to COVID-19 vaccines," in December of 2022.

A little more than a year later and the panel has released its first preliminary report.

The 33-page report claims there's "no sound evidence" so far that masks effectively prevent the spread of COVID-19. It also suggests that areas with enforced lockdowns saw higher overall death rates. https://cbs12.com/news/local/governor-ron-desantis-florida-grand-jury-releases-report-on-covid-19-protocols-florida-news-february-6-2024

Just the tip of what is coming out in the Covid-19 investigations in many countries. Finding that lockdowns and masks brought about worse outcomes. 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Medical knowledge is determined by scientists, not by right-wing weirdos or by juries. And Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, not on bullshit. Read WP:MEDRS. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

The article is extremely biased and most of the "fact check" citations are opinion or three years old. Much newer information regarding Dr Bhakdi's coment have come about. One is the "vaccines" are indeed killing people. The Us National Academy of Science has stated that any myocarditis after "vaccination" is caused by the "vaccine". That's essentially killing people. It is biased articles like this that caused me to stop being a donor for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruce A. WIlliamson (talk • contribs) 14:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Your conclusions are invalid. COVID causes severe myocarditis that actually kills people. The vaccine causes mild myocarditis that does not. You should inform yourself at more reliable places.

Even if your conclusions were valid, we would not be able to use them because Wikipedia is based on reliable sources and not on the opinions of random people on the internet.

Also, Wikipedia does not take bribes in exchange for modifying articles in a direction the briber likes. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Your "reliable" sources are being debunked every day. It is now proven that the Covid Vaccine does induce myocarditis. The Lancet for one: Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in the USA: a cohort study in claims databases - The Lancet

You people need to shake yourselves up and get some real facts out there. 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Virtually your whole article on Dr Bhakdi is invalid. 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Source please (and read wp:rs)? Slatersteven (talk) 14:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The fact that if I mention Wikipedia to back up any of my views people scoff and say, "Wikipedia" which shows that the bias exhibited by Wikipedia has brought it into disrepute and disdain. 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Correct. We're seeing young people die every year and all-cause mortality has risen in every highly vaccinated country. Time Wikipedia read the room or you will expire. 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

German officials warned lockdowns cause more harm than good, documents show

Evidence for making masks mandatory was lacking, according to health agency’s deliberations released after long legal battle: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/03/25/german-health-agency-covid-lockdown-masks-legal-battle/ 222.152.208.34 (talk) 23:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)