Talk:Sud-Ouest Espadon/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Zawed in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
I will review, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Lead
- link mixed-power?
- Spelled it out instead.
Background
- link Lucien Servanty
- ...and submitted the SO.6020 when the French Air Force issued not crazy about the phrasing here. Suggest something like "and submitted a design proposal, designated SO.6020, in response to the French Air Force issuing..."
- Rephrased.
- The aircraft had have a speed "had have"? Maybe " had to have.
- with planes to order "plans"?
- aircraft satisfied the requirements. suggest "aircraft satisfied its requirements.
- The aircraft was a metal-skinned mid-wing suggest "As built, the aircraft was a metal-skinned mid-wing..."
- was the Heinkel ejection seat part of the original specification?
- Yes.
Development
- possibly due to the need to revise the air intakes shouldn't intakes be singular? Or should the first mention of intakes be plural?
- Good catch.
- Is there a link for SO.6025?
- No.
- I'm confused by the references to the SO.6021 in this section. On the one hand, it is a fighter prototype and on the other it is the proposed production version.
- I think that I've clarified it now
Specifications
- Is it necessary to recite the book titles here, can't [16], [17] just go against the "General characteristics" heading?
- The aircraft specs template won't allow that
- OK, I didn't realise that was a template. Zawed (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Other stuff
- One dupelink - cockpit
- Image tags look OK
That's it for me. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hey Sturm, just checking you've seen this. Zawed (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good to me, passing as GA as I believe it meets the criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- See if my changes are satisfactory. Thanks for being patient with me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)