Talk:Sudan/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Number of Nubian speakers?

This article says that more than 6 million people in Sudan speak Nubian languages. The article about Nubian languages say 900,000 speakers Worldwide. Can anyone clarrify?Helenuh (talk) 03:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

I removed the 6 million (600,000 might be possible) and another sentence claiming 8 million Hausa speakers (80,000 would be possible). Errors of this magnitude cast a shadow of doubt on the entire section on languages. Oikolukija2 (talk) 10:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Language and ethnic groups

Sudan country is Arab country and the official language is only Arabic. In English version that conflicts with Arabic one LeonelleMarks (talk) 04:40, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

I am sure this question has been treated many times before. But here is a link that may answer your question: Arabization#Arabization_in_Sudan_2 - If you ask people in Sudan, if they consider themselves "Arabs" or "African", you will receive different answers: Some will say they are Arabs, referring to the language, religion or the history of immigration from the north or the Arabian peninsula. Some will say, they are both, referring to their skin colour or other physical features, the African part of their culture (Sudanese music, for example, is different from Arabic music). Others will say, they are not Arab at all, but Africans, who speak Arabic and have absorbed some elements from Arabic countries into their own culture. In my opinion, Sudanese are really a mixture of both cultures, and you cannot impose a specific group identity onto any human being. Everyone has the right to define this for themselves, just like the Berbers of North Africa, who often speak their own language, and reject the notion "Arabic" applied to them. Munfarid1 (talk) 09:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Another note on language & ethnic groups - can someone update the info in the demographics portion of the article? The sources cited in this portion are from 2010/2011. I'm making this note in 2019... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1418:410A:E513:BD9F:AF46:7FEB (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Another note on ethnic group demographics - the infobox on the right has the following numbers: 84.6% Arab, 36.5% Beja, 8.2% Nubians, and 6.4% Fur, for a total of ~137% population. I do not think this is right as it is over 100%, but don't have a current source to update. Tcpekin 10:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@Mr. James Dimsey:, it looks like you added these numbers on 31 March. What's the source, so we can make sense of this? Pathawi (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

I relied on the distribution of the population according to their density and their ratio, from one region to another and the groups and races that exist in a specific region. Sudan is inhabited by a large number of tribes of Arab and African origins and since ancient history these tribes began to mix with each other, until it is difficult at the present time to find pure origins in some part of Sudan; and mixing appeared in the Northern and Central Parts of the country. As for the numbers that I added, I can remove them because there are no sources for them due to the absence of any official census of the population, and the lack of figures or data that are not accurate enough to be confirmed. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 16:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Language: National, Official, &c

I've just made a change to the infobox that I'd like to explain, as there have been a few recent changes. This article uses Template:Infobox country, the specification for which includes:

|official_languages = <!--Languages recognised in legislation, constitution, etc-->
|national_languages = <!--Country/territory-wide languages recognised but not necessarily in country/territory-wide law, etc-->
|regional_languages = <!--Languages recognised or associated with particular regions within the country/territory-->

Official languages should be those officially legislated; national languages should have broad recognition.

The 2005 Constitution §1.8 covers language policy. In §1.8.3, both Arabic and English are decreed to be the two official languages for government functions & higher education. (تكون العربية، باعتبارها لغة رئيسية على الصعيد القومي، والإنجليزية، اللغتين الرسميتين لأعمال الحكومة القومية ولغتي التدريس في التعليم العالي.)

The Transitional Constitutional Document of 2019 repeals the 2005 Constitution, though it does not repeal other laws passed under it. Thus, 2005's §1.8.3 is no longer in effect. The 2019 document is almost entirely centred on the functioning of the transitional government, & does not specify an official language.

Unless some law was passed under the 2005 Constitution respecifying an official language, the Sudan does not have an official language right now.

But by the definition this template uses, it may be legitimate to see Arabic (not Sudanese Arabic, as that excludes Fuṣḥā, which is clearly the language of state action) as the national language. Pathawi (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Per capita income

Per capital income nominal is 35,000?😬😬😬 who edited this lie and when did Sudan become such a high income economy Nlivataye (talk) 09:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Remove Mention of "North Sudan"

North Sudan is mentioned no where else in the article besides the random six citations in the first sentence. Six random citations is not worthy of putting it in the first sentence, because it is very rare for this name to refer to Sudan. A simple google search garners 1/1000 the results for "North Sudan" compared to "Sudan," while different names of other countries, for example "United States" vs "United States of America" or "America" differs only by at most a factor of 10. Clearly having so many citations for something obscure in the first sentence is unnecessary. Does anyone else support removal? Bill Williams (talk) 06:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

The country's official name is not North Sudan. Here in the Sudan, it is not referred to by that name. Do people in South Sudan call their neighbour 'North Sudan'? The only South Sudanese source I ever look at is Radio Tamazuj, which just uses 'Sudan'. Unless there's some significant community of use, I think 'North Sudan' should go. Pathawi (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the input, I'll remove it from the article. Bill Williams (talk) 03:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2021

129.205.113.31 (talk) 22:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

the percentage give to the Fulani tribe is supposed to be 10%

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 22:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2018 and 22 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vincenttiziani.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Masjid Al-Nilin, August 2007 - by Nick Hobgood.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Syracuse University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 15:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the native administration system in Sudan provides formal administrative roles to traditional leaders? Source: [1]
  • ALT1: ... that the native administration system, used in Sudan to govern rural areas, was adapted for use in internally displaced people camps? Source: pg 230-232
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Baby! 1
  • Comment: Other hook suggestions welcome!

Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Self-nominated at 05:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Native administration; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Just a suggestion, as the hook seems to be spread around several sentences (it is cited in the "System" section so its alright already), I suggest adding citation at the end of every sentences mentioning the IDPs instead of just one at every paragraph. Other than that, its fine. Nyanardsan (talk) 09:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Sudan Product Exports (2019).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Arabs

Arabs at 70%?😳 I think the situation is more nuanced than that. Most have some Arab ancestry no more than 20% like African Americans do with European ancestry on their paternal line; doesn't mean however they are classified as White. So I would say most predominantly Black or maybe Afro Arab but to just say Arab is false and misleading. Actual Arab population is a tiny minority 197.186.3.21 (talk) 15:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Coup in Sudan right now

There is a coup going on in Sudan right now, is there a box for this, to place at the top of the page? ://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/15/africa/sudan-presidential-palace-intl/index.html TheNewbornAtlantic (talk) 01:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

There is an article, 2023 Sudan clashes. Not sure what you want this page to do. This is the main country article. 25stargeneral (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps a box with a notice of conflict with a link to the 2023 Sudan clashes page? TheNewbornAtlantic (talk) 04:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Ya, I think is necessary for awareness' sake, many people dying by the day. Tonymynd (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Accuracy of percentage of Christians in Sudan

Given the recent developments and interest in Sudan, I went to the Wikipedia entry for the country and happened to notice that the percentage of Christians in Sudan is stated as "4.5%". I was curious about this and did some Googling. I found the following reference, which reports a larger number. I am wondering if this statistic requires a re-visit...?

 https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Sudan/christians/ 75.161.35.251 (talk) 23:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

In regards to your comment, I understand the importance of using reliable sources and diversifying them when conducting research. It is always recommended to use multiple sources to verify the accuracy of the information you are using. Sarah SchneiderCH (talk) 00:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Abyei Area shown as Condominium on the map.

The Abyei is not a disputed/claimed area of Sudan like the Halaib Triangle is. It's a condominium, a shared piece of land between the Republic of the Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan. It would be best to put it as a striped area on the map. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Abyei is a disputed area claimed by Sudan. The purported condominium status is an analogy, in reality the land is effectively run by the United Nations. CMD (talk) 03:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Disruptions

I think the user Cookiemonster1618 is disrupting this page with inaccurate information. They are changing percentages and information that are clearly stated in the links provided and suggesting that new information is in other links, yet it's nowhere to be found. Not sure what to do here. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Maybe list specific diffs with the issues so that it can be discussed here in the Talk page rather than in edit summaries. Pathawi (talk) 02:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

The religion section in the infobox has a link to https://www.thearda.com/world-religion/national-profiles?u=211c, stating that Sunni Islam is 94.9, Christian is 2.9, Ethnic religionist is 1.1 and nonreligious is 1.1 but they keep replacing the information with different numbers. The numbers supposedly come from the CIA link they listed, yet those numbers are not there. There is nothing in the CIA link that states that.

diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudan&diff=1166806800&oldid=1166806568

diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudan&diff=1166440406&oldid=1166264729 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

The numbers did not come from the CIA page website. And I have no idea who the hell is the user you are talking about and I dont have any connections to them. The wesbite you provided is not accurate and is not the true reality of the religious demographics of Sudan. The numbers for religion were already put there a month ago with the source and the source is accurate which is the MRG website as well as another source from another website verified by local estimates. Armenians living in Sudan as a miniscule minority to attend their churches does not mean they are one of the indigenous ethnic groups of Sudan. Iranians also live in Armenia and have one Mosque yet they aren't one of the Indigenous communities there nor do they constitute a significant percentage of the population. There are also Armenians in Ethiopia yet they dont constitute a major percentage for them to be considered a native ethnic group there. Almost all sources list the Nuba people as one of the Indigenous ethnic groups of Sudan. The percentages for religion were put with the source but Pathawi removed it for some reason. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

If the numbers didn't come from the CIA source, why did you list it as a source? Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 10:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

The numbers for religion were put there a month ago, by you, after you changed them to that lesser source/blog. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 10:48, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Armenians should be listed simply because they are an ethnicity in Sudan. They should also be listed in Iran too. Nothing about the ethnicity section says only indigenous peoples should be there. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 10:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Pathawi mentioned that they removed it because the source you keep pushing (is it your blog?) is not good. Same reason I changed the information back to a reliable figure. You should stop using that blog altogether. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

I want to be clear that I removed it because the data in question was already supported by a more recent source—not because it was necessarily flawed. I want to suggest again that there's an obvious compromise solution available here: You can list a numerical range: 94.9%{{cite source}}–97%{{cite source}}. I think this is actually probably the best solution even without a conflict. Edit: To be clear, tho, I think we only need one source per figure. It should be the most reliable source. Pathawi (talk) 10:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't matter I added a source that supports my claim and is authentically right. Most Christians in Sudan are either Copts or are from areas in Southern Sudan bordering South Sudan. They make up 1.2% of the population, followers of traditional religions also make up 1.2% and other religions 0.6% for a total of 3% of the total population combined. The source is not old and is authentic. Censuses from 2011 and 2010 won't be considered older sources by you also than?. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I think you might be getting distracted by something that doesn't matter, here: The source was redundant. The information it supported was already supported. Adding it won't address the issue that you and Wkpdsrnm2023 have. No source explicitly excludes Armenians and no source that you guys have been working with includes Nuba people, tho it ought to be easy to find one that does. Again: Why not just list a range for the population reflecting the different sources, find a reliable source that mentions Nuba people, and list both ethnicities? This should be a case in which you can both include the content you want—it doesn't have to be either/or. Pathawi (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

There are multiple sources that include the Nuba people as a major ethnic group of Sudan. Armenians do not form a major percentage for them to be considered an ethnic group and I am not distracted. I think I know more about my country than some user who's saying I'm "vandalising" the article. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

There are certainly multiple sources that mention the Nuba. Just none of those you two are dealing with. Population numbers alone might not be the only indicator of salience for mention in a Wikipedia article. The tone of your most recent message comes off as angry. I encourage you to think about how to move past the current conflict. I've tried to suggest a solution that I thought would work for both you and Wkpdsmm2023. Perhaps you can think of a better one. Edit: & remember—it doesn't matter who knows more. What matters is what's supported by the best reliable sources. Pathawi (talk) 21:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

That www.thearda.com link near the religion section of the infobox also talks about there being a small minority of Armenian church attendees in Sudan, which is why I reverted their removal of the Armenians in the ethnicity section. They are adamant that it should be replaced with some other group that has no source, yet they insist it does.

diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudan&diff=1166805850&oldid=1166805617

The reason I am suspicious of them is because their account was helping alter edits on this page around the same time that a sockpuppet by the name of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brlob was removing information on this page, so that the removed information couldn't be easily reverted. This was about a month ago. They also have the same editing style as Brlob, three to five edits at a time, usually very minor changes on ethnic pages that have little to no traffic.

diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudan&diff=1156813321&oldid=1156245361

Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 08:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm not going to address all of these at once. On the religion one, I'm a little perplexed by what's going on. It seems pretty clear that ARDA is a better source than the Minority Rights page—the former is an academic source where the methods are public. It's also more recent. & you're right that the CIA World Factbook does not give that 97% number. But the numbers you're citing aren't what I see at ARDA: I'm seeing 91.67% Muslim (91.60% Sunni), 4.5% Christian, 2.76% Ethnic religionists, 1.05% Non-religious. What's going on here? Pathawi (talk) 22:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh, I guess you are right about those numbers. I was only looking at the graph rather than the list under it. But regardless, these numbers are not the ones that CookieMonster1618 is changing things too. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

I would propose to both of you that the best path forward might be to present a range. Pathawi (talk) 00:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

There's no reason that the section needs to address only "indigenous" populations. That's not what the wording says. This also doesn't have to be either/or. The Nuba are obviously a very important set of ethnic groups in contemporary Sudan. Both of these groups could be in this list. Pathawi (talk) 22:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

I agree, I'm just curious why the Armenians were taken out. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 14:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't look to me like this user is a sockpuppet of Briob—I would guess that this is just unfortunate timing & a failure of communication. If you think they are, you could ask for a check at [2]. Pathawi (talk) 22:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

I was looking at that page earlier but I just don't understand how the process works. Any resources for how to get a check done? Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 14:30, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

It's actually here. Sorry! At the top of the page there are instructions, with a textbox for beginning the process. Again, I don't think this is the same user. Pathawi (talk) 00:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

@Wkpdsrnm2023 I reviewed most of @Cookiemonster1618 edits, and I found most of them to be useful. I would advise you two to engage and assume good faith FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

The webiste for religion and ethnic percentages of Sudan come from this source https://minorityrights.org/country/sudan/ which I provided and put but Pathawi removed it. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

There is a WP:3O process that you can use if reached a deadlock FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

I removed it because the data present (only the 97% number) was already sourced (CIA World Factbook), and this was a lower quality & older source. There's no data that was sourced that is now not. I'm not sure what you're referring to, Cookiemonster1618. Pathawi (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

The article needs to be updated and improved

The article has very old information and as much information as possible, must be added to reliable sources and this is a very big effort; that requires an active contribution for those who have a good background or simple information. I can help whenever I can and I wish cooperation and a great response and thank you. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Nubian population in Sudan

I dont understand how its ok to use Joshua Project for determining the percentage of Fulani in Sudan but not Nubians when the CIA profile also states that Nubians are an ethnic group in Sudan. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

It's not okay. I caught one mistake & I didn't see the other. Pathawi (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Official languages of Sudan

This is what the text of the Constitution of the Republic of Sudan (2005) states about their official languages: "Language/ 8 (1) All indigenous languages of the Sudan are national languages and shall be respected, developed and promoted./ (2) Arabic is a widely spoken national language in the Sudan./ (3) Arabic, as a major language at the national level and English shall be the official working languages of the national government and the languages of instruction for higher education. (4) In addition to Arabic and English, the legislature of any subnational level of government may adopt any other national language as an additional official working language at its level./ (5) There shall be no discrimination against the use of either Arabic or English at any level of government." [3] So, as you can see both Arabic and English are official languages in Sudan, so I reinserted the correct information.Mistico Dois (talk) 00:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

I don't have any skin in this game, but I believe the 2005 Constitution was repealed by the 2019 draft charter. I don't think that that draft charter has an official language provision. If anything is an official language in Sudan right now, it comes from some other legislation—not a constitution. Unless, of course, I'm wrong. (There's a link to an English translation of the draft charter at Constitution of Sudan. I'll look for an Arabic version a little later, if this is an issue.) Pathawi (talk) 01:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

@Mistico Dois I think your source is far more reliable than mine even if it was superseded by 2019 Declaration as @Pathawi correctly noted that it doesn’t mention language. My edit was based on Sudanese law of 1991 buy the constitution is definitely supreme here FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

But if the Constitution was repealed, it's not really supreme any more… Pathawi (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

You say repelled but the 1st point in that declaration states that (roughly translated) all remains the same unless it contradicts the new stuff Arabic: أ. يلغى العمل بدستور جمهورية السودان الانتقالي لسنة 2005م ودساتير الولايات، على أن تظل القوانين الصادرة بموجبها سارية المفعول ما لم تبلغ أو تعدل FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm not a lawyer, but I'd translate this as: 'The Interim Constitution of Sudan of the year 2005 and the state constitutions shall be repealed; however, laws passed in accordance with them [these constitutions] shall remain in effect unless [repeal is?] announced or ammended.' I take this to mean that the national & state constitutions are repealed, but other laws that were passed during their time remain in effect. So if a national language law had been passed independently under the 2005 Constitution, that would remain in effect. But a provision of the Constitution would not. Pathawi (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

@Cookiemonster1618: You seem to have missed this conversation, started yesterday, before you made your most recent edit. There is a discussion on Talk. (I agree with your perspective on this, as per my previous comment, but the conversation is open.) Pathawi (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

@Pathawi I think this accounts is trolling me. They copied my edit summary. Not sure if they want to get me into socket puppeteering issue FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Actually, I think they were supporting your prior edit & used your edit summary because it was easier. I don't think you're being trolled. Pathawi (talk) 19:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

I guess I needed to be reminded to assume good faith 😁 FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Protection

Discussion started by a sock
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hi, i want to talk about something important. i mean we all know the situation in sudan now there is a civil war shoulden't the page of sudan be protected ??? Winipitia (talk) 21:39, 15 novembre 2024 (UTC) Protection is decided by on-wiki disruption. See WP:Protection policy. CMD (talk) 23:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)