Talk:Suicide attacks in the North Caucasus conflict
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Needs fixing! Extremely NPOV!
editSomeone needs to revert the changes introduced by 188.37.162.53 on 29 December 2013 (at 12:28). Not only does it not introduce anything new, it actually makes this article seem extremely biased/NPOV, besides introducing quasi-literary terms that shouldn't be present in an encyclopedic article when other more appropriate (i.e. neutral) terms exist (e.g. using "loved ones" instead of "people" or "citizens"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.249.40.171 (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks to Infernoapple for fixing this issue. 5.249.40.171 (talk) 09:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
No references
editThis article has no references. One can only guess where this information came from. Some data and claims can be found in "Further reading" document, but others can not found there. I have marked a couple of places, but there are many more. Biophys 01:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I hope four links out of ten shown by the Google would be enough for you. Please continue to mark what you think is unsourced.Vlad fedorov 12:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Ridiculous
editOverview section is completely unsourced and its focus and assertive style makes it look like a justification of attacks. Claims needs to be substituted and article thoroughly checked with someone with good command of English. --85.30.201.226 07:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Photo09.jpg
editThe image Image:Photo09.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
RENAME really needed
editThese attacks are no longer "Chechen", but rather are mostly Ingush and Dagestani. Even the reactivated "Riyad-us Saliheen" isn't no longer "Chechen" in its name. "North Caucasian" or maybe rather "Caucasus-related" (as there were also blasts blamed on suicide bombers also in the Russian heartland) would fit much more. Also, actually even early it was hardly only Chechens. --212.91.5.20 (talk) 15:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Proposed move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved per request, as explained in above section. - GTBacchus(talk) 23:41, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Chechen suicide attacks → Suicide attacks in the North Caucasus conflict — Relisted for further input. Jafeluv (talk) 08:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
21:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Why?--Kotniski (talk) 14:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Explained one section above? --Asperchu (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 0 external links on Suicide attacks in the North Caucasus conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)