This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Neutrality
editThe article doesn't seem to include nearly enough of the company's response/viewpoints to the lawsuit discussion that makes up the bulk of the article. —Darkwind (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- @Darkwind: I added a brief source position of the company, and removed the section tag about the weight of the argument. But did not take off the tag at the beginning of the article.Onel5969 (talk) 23:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)