Talk:Sun Jianai/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 22:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 13:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

• Sun Jinai was born in Suzhou, Anhui on 7 April 1827. I would mention Qin China in the first sentence.
  • Done. - G
• Do we know anything of his family background?
  • Sadly not. :( - G
• Perhaps some context for the "imperial examinations"? (..., needed to a career in state administration/a preequisite for an administrative career/...)
  • Clarified. - G
• Shortly into their service, both tutors upset conservative Manchu officials after recommending that the 17th century Ming loyalists Huang Zongxi and Gu Yanwu be enshrined at the Beijing Temple of Confucius. Some context, perhaps in a footnote? Who are the Manchus? Who were the Ming loyalists? Borsoka (talk) 14:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Added a footnote. - G
• Introduce Li Hongzhang.
  • Done. - G
• In the aftermath of the Sino-Japanese War, officials began to advocate for the creation of a national university. A link to the war? What is the connection between the war and the university?
  • Clarified. - G
• ...to gain greater control over the guidance... Over the guidance?
• ..., but was forced to defer to his approval... By whom? I am not sure I understand the text.
  • Rewrote this section a bit. - G
• ...the first imperial minister of the university Some explanation?
  • Clarified. - G
• ....Empress Dowager Cixi regained power... We were not informed that she had lost power. Borsoka (talk) 02:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Rewrote this a bit. - G
• ...was a Qing dynasty official and educator, noted as an advisor and tutor to the Guangxu Emperor. I would refer to China in the first sentence.
• What is the logic behind the selection of the ministries in the lead? For instance the Ministry of Finance is omitted, the Ministry of Rites is mentioned although he served for the former for four or five years, and for the latter only for one or two years. Borsoka (talk) 01:07, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Image review

• File:Emperor Guangxu (cropped).jpg: a US PD tag is needed.
  • Added. - G
• File:王文韶、銘安、孫家鼐、豫師.jpg: a US PD tag is needed.
  • This has one of those combination China/US PD tags. - G

Source review

• Only high-level academic sources are cited.
• Fan (1995): publisher is missing.
• Kwong (2000): publisher is missing.
• Either mention the place of publication at each cited work, or delete it. Borsoka (talk) 13:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
  • To my knowledge its fairly standard practice to not list publishers for journals, but list them for books. Fixed Harvard lacking location though, thank you for catching that. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
• @Borsoka: I made the requested changes. :) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 19:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
• The source of references 3, 4, 8-10, 17 and 21 is not listed in section "Sources" (I refer to the page range.)
• Reference 1 is checked.
• Why is reference 3 necessary?
• Reference 10 does not verify the text. Borsoka (talk) 01:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)