Talk:Sunbeam Crusader
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Petebutt in topic Handley Page Type "O"
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Sunbeam Crusader be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Short 827
editWas the Short 827, as the article suggests, particularly more notable than any of the other aircraft applications ? --Red Sunset 22:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps in terms of numbers built. There were altogether 108 Type 827s built by five different manufacturers (including Sunbeam); of the other aircraft mentioned, only the Sikorsky (approx. 80 aircraft, i.e. 320 engines) comes close and perhaps deserves a mention. The Handley Page "O" , of which some 600 were built, seems to have been powered by the Rolls-Royce Eagle, not the Sunbeam Crusader; perhaps early versions used the Sunbeam - the wiki article is unclear on this point. --TraceyR (talk) 23:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks TraceyR; that explains the reasoning behind the entry which could now be briefly clarified/expanded. Having checked the HP "O" wiki article, I too was in doubt about its inclusion in the list of Crusader users; perhaps the originating editor has some info on this. --Red Sunset 18:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Handley Page Type "O"
editI note that the Wolverhampton Museum site refers to two engines having been supplied for this aircraft, but it seems unlikely that only two would have been fitted, since it was a four-engined bomber. A mixed configuration would have been unusual for many reasons. Is there any more evidence for the Crusader having been used on the Type "O"? --TraceyR (talk) 15:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Quite so TraceyR, it does seem a rather unlikely scenario unless the idea was to test the engines out without putting all of the eggs in one basket so-to-speak. But even if only two examples were used, would it not still be correct to include the Type "O" in the list perhaps with a note to that effect?I have no further evidence to provide. --Red Sunset 15:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- What am I thinking about; the Type "O" was a twin-engined aircraft!!! DOH! --Red Sunset 17:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that! I was confusing it with the Sikorsky! --TraceyR (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you're still interested two typeOs were ordered powered by Crusaders but later cancelled.Petebutt (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC)