Talk:Sunderland station

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/tyne/tyne6.html

  Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 09:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 6 January 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved  — Amakuru (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

---

Sunderland station → Sunderland railway station – @Comes Dunelmensis and Redrose64: To resolve a possible dispute, because there are contradictory opinions here. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

• oppose per WP:NCUKSTATIONS, as it is not only a railway station but also a Metro station, so the current title better covers these two functions.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose I already explained why here. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose As per WP:NCUKSTATIONS - IE Bradford Interchange not Bradford Interchange railway station. The joy of all things (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose Per the above Jeni ^(talk) 12:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose since it's not just a railway station. And for Pinky's sake, keep "station" lower case. We do not need to go over that stuff again.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  05:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.