Talk:Sunni Tehreek
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sunni Tehreek article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editVery Strong Keep The Sunni Tehreek is a prominent Organization of Jamat e AhleSunnah of pakistan.The Speedy deletion Notice is Nothing but a Bias on part of editor who has already tried in his past to Delete all the Inetrnal wiki pages on Barelwi Article.Shabiha (t) 17:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
This article is biased.
editClearly by using words like "so called" in the history the writer is showing a bias. I came here looking for a clear idea of what this group was about and there seems to have been editing by both those who appreciate and disagree with the groups politics. Because of this I find this article questionable. There is also quite a few grammar problems that make it difficult for an English speaker to understand. Quite a few of the things mentioned in the article have no reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lionssmile (talk • contribs) 05:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Overhaul needed
editObviously, the current article was written by supporters of Sunni Tehreek. That does not mean that the information is false, but it does mean that a major overhaul is needed to maintain neutrality. Also, the writing itself needs major improvements. I have gone through and corrected some of the basic grammatical problems to make it more readable, but as previously stated the lack of citations and objectivity means that this page should be approached cautiously by the reader for the time being. If anyone with a good understanding of Pakistani political groups could help out with some re-writing here, it would go a long way toward making this a better article. Bubaloo (talk) 07:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Disruptive editing by Msoamu
editUser:Msoamu: Your edits have been reverted by multiple users now. It is clear that your edits are contentious and you need to discuss them here before continuing. And without insulting other editors or speculating about their personal beliefs, please. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sunni Tehreek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090302125628/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/articleshow/1011659.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1011659.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sunni Tehreek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1011659.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
"In April 2007, alleged Sunni Tehreek members opened gunfire on an Ahl al-Hadith mosque in Karachi", citation problem
editThere is a problem with one of the citations for the paragraph that begins: "In April 2007, alleged Sunni Tehreek members opened gunfire on an Ahl al-Hadith mosque in Karachi". The citation does not appear to mention the incident - see this link to Google books page 275. I have removed the citation and replaced it with a FACT tag.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)