Talk:Super-resolution imaging
 | The contents of the Super-resolution page were merged into Super-resolution imaging on July 24, 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyphen or not
editThe unhyphenated form superresolution, used even at the beginning of the subject [1], seems now to have superseded the less-often used super-resolution -- see Optics Info Base. I propose that the redirect be not from superresolution to super-resolution but the other way. If the abbreviation SR is used in the rest of the entry, there should be no problem.Gwestheimer 16:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- ^ McCutchen C. J. opt. Soc. Am. 57:1190, 1967
Trying for an entry that gives an overall layout of the subject and conveys the essential concepts, I have opted for a separate page entitled "Superresolution" rather than shoehorning the material into the current more technically-oriented page "Super-resolution." This involves undoing the re-direct from "Superresolution" to "Super-resolution" and inserting into each of these pages a reference to the other under "See also."
Gwestheimer 18:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwestheimer (talk • contribs)
- That was a terrible idea. There is no reason why we can't have both the technical and the non-technical in the same article. And then to have the only difference be the hyphen is even worse. I'm recombining the pages. Ego White Tray (talk) 12:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with Ego White Tray, to the contrary, that was my original intent, except that I found the job of integrating the two entries and dealing with the tags and the many self-serving references too daunting. But I will now have a go at it. So Wiki-constabulary, please hold off tagging for a week or two.Gwestheimer 22:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwestheimer (talk • contribs)
More on which techniques for which applications
editWhich techniques are used on aerial photography or on satellite imagery or for optical astronomy ? Is multi-frame SR the main technique ? Are there SR techniques specific to enhancing video ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
The 2nd sentence of the intro is long, and perhaps too complicated for the intro ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Question on introduction
editAre MRI and Computed Tomography really examples of radar/sonar applications? - Evariste1832 (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)