Talk:SuperClash

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SuperClash article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	SuperClash is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

SuperClash 3 - Title unification

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, the article currently reads This match was to unify the AWA and WCCW Titles. If I understood the DVD The Spectacular Legacy of the AWA correctly it was originally planned The King Lawler looses the title somewhen in the AWA-area, but since he wasn't paid (even by now) his salaries from the SuperClash 3 he never appeared on AWA programme, house shows or the like. The AWA wihout notifying him stripped the title from him and gave it to the winner of a Battle Royal. -- Bardnet 10:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The titles were unified, the unification just didn't last long. This usually doesn't happen in wrestling, but happens a lot in boxing (they called titles unified just because one person holds both). TJ Spyke 02:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic