Talk:Super Bowl XLV

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Bowl XLV article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

A news item involving Super Bowl XLV was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 February 2011.

Wikipedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Bay Packers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Rodgers Statline is wrong

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Rodgers went 24/39, not 24/29. This also alters his passer rating which is wrong. 2603:8001:1300:5590:D4BF:5CD5:C4C:64F4 (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Where are you seeing this? Everything looks correct to me? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply