This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
A speedy tag was on this but seems to have disappeared in the move. This is a good solid article, and a historic subject. I'd be happy for it to be kept, or otherwise merged with the parents' article. Tyrenius02:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I was checking new pages and this had a WP:SPEEDY tag, but it had 4 references. A few changes to make it look better, and it's a nice article. She seems pretty famous, too, although I don't know anything about Methodism. We should definitely keep this article. - Peregrine Fisher05:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
My mistake I tagged the article before it was wikified. At that point I couldn't tell that she was both the daughter and the mother of important people as I know nothing about Methodism and the links weren't there. At that point seemed to me to be about a person who led an interesting life but asserted no notability and had some religious POV issues. I tag a lot of articles and I do make a mistake here and there, my apologies and thanks to those of you who have worked to clean up the article. --Daniel J. Leivick05:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I think I liked "In spite of her religious practices throughout her life she didn’t become deeply religious until after she was seventy" better than "She maintained her faith and practiced daily devotions, but it was not until after she was seventy that she experienced a deeper spiritual fulfilment." It matches the web references better. Any preferences? - Peregrine Fisher06:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
You're quite correct. To be honest, I was just tidying up the text on the page and hadn't gone to the refs. I've put in a correction. Amend if you wish. Tyrenius06:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
The abbreviated text does not sound like the Susanna Wesley we had previously envisioned. Maybe it's more accurate, but it would be a shift. What does the word 'religious' mean?MaynardClark (talk) 18:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply