Talk:Susquehanna Transfer

Requested move 10 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 19:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

---

Susquehanna Transfer station → Susquehanna Transfer – proper name, commom name, sui generis, no disam needed, occupied by redirect Djflem (talk) 15:10, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

• That seems potentially controversial under WP:USSTATION, so it should be discussed. A similar issue of potential naming redundancy is currently under discussion at Talk:Secaucus Junction. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
  • This is a contested technical request (permalink). Sam Sailor 18:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
  • @Djflem and BarrelProof: queried move request. Sam Sailor 18:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''',then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support Unique proper and common name; "station" is redundant, repetitive; no disam needed. see also:Talk:Secaucus Junction#Requested move 6 July 2021.Djflem (talk) 21:51, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Incomplete article?

The history stops at 1940. What about the war years? What caused the station to close? Jaysbro (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)