 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Green retrofit page were merged into Sustainable refurbishment on 21 September 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I propose to merge this article with the "Green retrofit" article. The two terms are synonymous but Green Retrofit is a bit more accessible and has a higher search rate on Google. I feel like having one page for the same information will also make it much clearer to find this information. I can also redirect the current page to Green retrofit. Objections? Jpersico14 (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Jpersico14
Agree Seems economical and 'Green retrofit' was created first. Although why someone has switched this article to American '-ize' spellings I don't know.TobyJ (talk) 06:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Agree I also wonder if the spelling differences are a hint that the multiplication of articles are in part differences in culturally-common terms for similar activities. For example I (anecdotally) see Deep energy retrofit a fair bit in the USA. AdabhaelTalk 05:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)