Talk:Sutorina

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Joy in topic Bosnian territory claims

Bosnian territory claims

edit

Stop the false editing. No government official from Bosnia and Herzegovina has ever said that Sutorina should be a part of the Bosnian territory! Do something useful instead, like, uploading some photos or stuff... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.94.101.49 (talkcontribs) 14 April 2010‎

Before my cleanup yesterday, the article appeared to be a big WP:COATRACK violation - it focused entirely on a fairly low-intensity territorial dispute, without providing sources. It still contains the bulk of that information, but without the most egregiously biased parts. It could still use some help, though. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 06:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
The dispute content is now at Sutorina dispute. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
If everything about the dispute is transferred from the Sutorina page to the dispute page then we can proceed on removing the "merge process" template on the page. Cheers. Hazbulator™ 22:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazbulator (talkcontribs)
I suggest moving Sutorina dispute to Sutorina, instead of having two articles.--Zoupan 00:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
The location is a gazetteer item and as such it deserves an article according to WP:5, it's not inherently notable just because of the dispute. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply