This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
I agree with User:Hyperbole. When I read this, I thought, "hagiography". There's no need to exaggerate; the real story is dramatic (and impressive) enough. Concretely, it's full of terms like "worked doggedly" or "At enormous risk to herself and her family," that don't meet Wikipedia style. See WP:PEACOCK. Adjectives, adverbs and platitudes should be deleted. The long reference to Yad Vashem doesn't belong in the Summary; there are other important things in the body that should be summarized. She also worked with Catholics and Protestants. Compare this to the French version https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzanne_Spaak Is her portrait by Magritte in public domain? --Nbauman (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply