Talk:Suzdal
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
etimologia
editriver Suzdar near vilage Logdus in Vologda region 176.65.96.7 (talk) 08:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reads like a manual
editI'm unclear on how this article reads like a manual. Have edited to a more neutral POV. Vanessa hexagon (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- I agree for the most part, ignoring the Tourism section. I'll open a new discussion for it but I believe the tourism section to be the main issue, as it lists "main sights" which reads more like a travel guide than encyclopedia. I'd recommend a different section, for example on the "protected buildings" or "special buildings" etc. Shibabao (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Tourism section + sourcing
editAs I've mentioned in a reply before, I feel like the tourism section is the main issue of this article. It reads more like a travel guide than an encyclopedic article, so I'd recommend renaming it (e.g. "notable buildings") and adjusting the contents a little.
On another topic, most of the sources are in Russian so I cant fact-check them. Im quite busy at the moment but so I'd ask for assistance but should nobody else do it within a few weeks, I might go through the English sources myself. I also wonder if other English sources should be included; most seem to be from Russia Beyond the Headlines, a news portal owned by Russia Today that has been accused of propaganda in the past. If nobody replies to this, I'll assume thats a yes and look for those as well. Shibabao (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)