Talk:Suzuki Cervo

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Could we maybe archive some of this previously valid criticism? I feel that the article is quite decent by now, in spite of the ongoing (and often incorrect) flow of strictly UK market information. Maybe there should be a separate "Whizzkid" page for those who only worry about what happened to the 1st gen Cervo in the British market? Mr.choppers (talk) 07:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good god this needs a cleanup! 85.210.160.77 13:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

agreed, it's mostly from a ridiculously UK perspective too - 'sold here by'!!! Scatterkeir (talk) 13:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Trying to clean this up a bit... thinking about just rewriting the whole thing. Mr.choppers (talk) 02:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Mr.choppersReply

Worst article in wikipedia?

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

maybe... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somatosis (talk • contribs) 16:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Potential Manufacturing by Lotus

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The website source referenced is IMHO unreliable, the surrounding quote on the article page even more so.

Post 1982 Lotus were part owned (circa 20%) by Toyota and were then later owned by GM, GM taking over from 1986 until 1993.

There appears to be nothing is nothing, anywhere in any published literature to support any intention by Lotus to produce these vehicles, which quite clearly require a completely different production facility to that used by Lotus throughout their entire history. 78.105.243.103 (talk) 14:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've ordered a book which should be able to tell me whether this is true or not. And you're right, the claims on that site don't hold too much water (as GM didn't even own Lotus until later). ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 20:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic