Talk:Svayam Bhagavan/Archive 4
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Wikidas in topic Svayam Bhagavan
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Svayam Bhagavan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Grammar
Multiple grammar issues, am working on fixing them... --Shruti14 t c s 18:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. There is a problem with both grammar and with a hidden POV that contrasts rather then nuances the views. In fact worship of Krishna is a refinement of the worship of Vishnu, many Vishnu bhaktas would worship Krishna (Krishna mutt in Udupi) and many Krishna bhaktas would pray to Vishnu (Ma Yasoda in tenth canto of Bhagavatam), as a refinement of the theological concept of monotheism in Vaishnavism as a whole, this article should be uniting, rather then dividing groups. So if anything some of the elements can be removed to emphasise this. Wikidās ॐ 01:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Svayam Bhagavan
Shouldn't the title of this page have capitals for both words, considering it is refering to a person? Chopper Dave (talk) 22:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I have to agree and it appears to be clear case of mistake on my part. Unless objected it will be moved. Wikidās-ॐ 22:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, and as there are no objections, will probably move the page soon. --Shruti14 t c s 16:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Done--Shruti14 t c s 17:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, and as there are no objections, will probably move the page soon. --Shruti14 t c s 16:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
This article is fill with mis-information
I have never seen such utter non-sense written about the Vedic religion, until reading the article!This is fill with fantastic, mis-informed notions...I dont know where to start! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.160.100.141 (talk) 07:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- i agree, to talk about gaudiya concepts is ok because thats what these encyclopedias are for, but calling it vedic religion or justify the belief when it was not the original belief of vedic doctrine since the beginning is wrong, so you should rewrite the article properly with correct information, talk about the concept but not make any false claim that it is the original or vedic belief, when infact it is a creation of caitainya mahaprabhu and the gaudiya sect —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.154.12.68 (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Is it common to talk to yourself in Wichita? I guess you should agree then:-) But remember - do not feed the trolls.. so.Wikidās ॐ 01:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for ?? what???
- If there are reliable sources that confirm 1) that we are talking about 'Vedic religion' and 2) Any of the notions are fantastic:-) please do not hesitate to add it to the article, any critical view is most welcomed! Wikidās ॐ 08:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)