Talk:Swancon
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tin Duck Award was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 April 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Swancon. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Tin Duck Award was copied or moved into SwanCon with this edit on 28 April 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Location of Archival Material
editFor the reference of anyone who wants to improve this article or otherwise research fandom in Western Australia. Swancon's archival materials are lodged with: The J.S. Battye Library of West Australian History, The Murdoch University Science Fiction Special Collection, and the Western Australian Science Fiction History Project. --Oxinabox (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
External references
editI found one good external reference for this subject. I thought I had another, but the website is on the Wikipedia blacklist. We really need to find more references. If anyone has access to Perth newspaper articles, science fiction magazines, etc., on SwanCon these would be helpful to list as external references. Bill Pollard (talk) 12:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've added some print media references, so the "Primary sources tag" is no longer the main issue. Thus I removed that tag. However, I'd like to encourage people to add some more references, so I've added ref improve - it isn't a major concern, but a few more references would help. :) I'll keep looking, as I presume the SF Encyclopedia should have something, and the SF Chronicle has a bit too, and there isn't a lot left to worry about. Notability shouldn't be a concern, as SwanCon generally gets independent coverage and there should be enough there now to pass the GNG, although given how long it has been around a lot of that coverage is likely to have been made prior to regular online archiving of stories.
- It would be nice to expand this with a full list of conventions and guests, and highlight which ones were the natcons. But I guess a partial list would be a bit ugly, so it is probably worth holding off until we can be fairly complete. - Bilby (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on SwanCon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516090326/http://community.livejournal.com/swancon to http://community.livejournal.com/swancon
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)