Talk:Swanmore College

Assessment/Improvements

I have assessed this article as Stub / Low. My main comments are that this school gives a limited amount of detailed information about the school. However, it lacks references meaning that the accuracy of its content might become disputable. To improve this article needs an infobox, a references section, a external link sections as well as separation of content into different section headings as appropriate. Camaron1 | Chris 20:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

External Links

External links section has now been added (July 2007)

Only to school website, more would be good... - tholly ^--Turnip-- 13:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC).

 Done - I've put in one to the school community website, that will do. - tholly ^--Turnip-- 15:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Uniform Section

Could someone add a section about uniform? Information about it is availible at http://www.swanmore-school.co.uk/uniform.html

References

 Doing... - I've put in an OFSTED one, but more are needed. - tholly ^--Turnip-- 13:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Content Separation

 Done - It looks like this has been done. - tholly ^--Turnip-- 13:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC) The school is very bad and doesnt treat bullying very well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.9.239.1 (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

I've gone back to a version of the article from early 2015, and still had to get rid of more nonsense.

I've also removed the carping "status" section.

Roxy the dog™ bark 17:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

WP:ALUMNI

Per WP:ALUMNI, "All alumni information must be referenced. See Wikipedia:Footnoting for technical help. Individual alumni need a citation to a) verify that they did indeed attend the school, and b) verify the statement of their notability in their short one- or two-line description." A CITATION IS NEEDED TO CONFIRM THAT ALUMNI ATTENDED SWANMORE. Elizium23 (talk) 04:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

WP:V has been met. now stop this nonsense. -Roxy, the dog. wooF 05:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

You deleted a valid citation that satisfied WP:V and you are now edit-warring to ensure that WP:V remains unmet. I do not understand why you are vehemently opposed to placing a citation here. Elizium23 (talk) 05:10, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

I am just following WP:PAG, which you clearly misunderstand despite serious editing chops. I'm quite shocked. Somewhere in the shenanigens of this morning you actually satisfied the requirements of WP:V yourself when you got a ref from Holden's article. It isn't needed in this article if it's there in hers, and linked. That's what WP:ALUMNI says. -Roxy, the dog. wooF 05:19, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Her notability does not need a reference, due to the existence of her article. Her alumni status definitely does need a reference in this article, which is exactly what WP:ALUMNI says - why are you misinterpreting it? Elizium23 (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)