Talk:Swazi people

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Africa: Eswatini / South Africa Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eswatini (assessed as Top-importance).
	South Africa portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa (assessed as Top-importance).

Some improvements

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have made some edits to the page, and I hope I can improve it. I shall rely on the standard literature of Swazi history and cultural anthropology. Ludvonga (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Historical info

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

i would like Historical information. i do know that these swazi people were allied to the Zulu's in the 1879 british-Zulu war but id like a entire history section even including earliest mention of the swazi people. like right now i do not know when these swazi people had become a separate tribe of people it is known that they were once part of a Nguni Kingdom in the year 1700 AD. when did Swazi branch off the nguni and form there own kingdom?. casue right now theres absolutely no history section on this page were as other ethnic group pages on wikipedia have history sections. 76.244.155.36 (talk) 13:31, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Swazis were not allied with Zulus in the Anglo-Zulu war. See http://samilitaryhistory.org/vol133hj.html for more details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludvonga (talk • contribs) 06:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Swazi people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120917001217/http://www.swazi.com/sibiya/sdpeople.html to http://www.swazi.com/sibiya/sdpeople.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic